Dozier v. Parker
Dozier v. Parker
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1560
NATHANIEL E. DOZIER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENRY PARKER; WILLIAM A. ROBERTSON, JR.; JOSEPH A. LEMING, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00019-JRS)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel E. Dozier, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles Richard Cranwell, CRANWELL MOORE & EMICK, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, Mark Quentin Emick, Jr., CRANWELL MOORE & EMICK, PLC, Vinton, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Nathaniel E. Dozier, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil action against Henry Parker and William A. Robertson, Jr., members of the Board of Supervisors of Prince George County, Virginia, and Joseph A.
Leming, a former member. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dozier v. Parker, No. 3:09-cv- 00019-JRS (E.D. Va. Apr. 22, 2009). We deny the Appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal or disregard Dozier’s informal reply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.