Shaw v. Lynchburg Dept of Social Services
Shaw v. Lynchburg Dept of Social Services
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1210
TAMMY J. SHAW; KGS, minor by her next friend; CAS, minor by her next friend; CJS, minor by her next friend, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. LYNCHBURG DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; BOB MCDONNELL, State Attorney General; ELEANOR DUNN, Deputy City Attorney; TIM KAINE; SALLY BARCA; LISA PARKS; DR. A. J. ANDERSON; INVESTIGATOR ROBERT W. MOORE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:08-cv-00022-nkm-mfu)
Submitted: September 15, 2009 Decided: September 22, 2009
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tammy J. Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander W. Bell, BELL & SCHNEIDER, PLC, Lynchburg, Virginia; Paul Kugelman, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Nora Beth Dorsey, Daniel M. Kincheloe, Jodi Beth Simopoulos, HANCOCK, DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Tammy J. Shaw appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shaw v. Lynchburg Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No. 6:08-cv-00022-nkm-mfu (W.D. Va. Jan. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.