Askew v. Wachovia Bank of Delaware
Askew v. Wachovia Bank of Delaware
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1596
DR. JOSEPH ASKEW; JOSEPH ASKEW, JR., Plaintiffs – Appellants, and ASKEW REALTY COMPANY; ASKEWS INVESTMENTS, Plaintiffs, v. WACHOVIA BANK OF DELAWARE; HOME EQ SERVICING CORPORATION; NADINE SMITH; BURKE & ASSOCIATES; KIMBERLY STARLING, and in her individual capacity; CARDINAL POINT REAL ESTATE; FIRSTSTAR BANK; TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (4:08-cv-00065-D)
Submitted: September 22, 2009 Decided: October 1, 2009
Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Askew, Joseph Askew, Jr., Appellants Pro Se. James C.
Lanik, ROBERSON, HAWORTH & REESE, High Point, North Carolina; Walter E. Brock, Jr., YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; James K. Pendergrass, Jr., PENDERGRASS LAW FIRM, Raleigh, North Carolina; P.C. Barwick, Jr., Kinston, North Carolina; John Huske Anderson, Jr., MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Dr. Joseph Askew and Joseph Askew, Jr., appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Askew v. Wachovia Bank of Delaware, No. 4:08-cv-00065-D (E.D.N.C. May 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.