United States v. Clark
United States v. Clark
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6300
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL DEWAYNE CLARK, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (7:92-cr-00417-GRA-1)
Submitted: September 14, 2009 Decided: September 30, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Dewayne Clark, Appellant Pro Se. William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Michael Dewayne Clark appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a court order directing the federal government to take custody of him or allow him to serve his federal sentence concurrently with his state sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Clark, No. 7:92-cr-00417-GRA-1 (D.S.C. Jan. 30, 2009).
We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.