U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. James

United States v. James
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 8, 2009

United States v. James

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7268

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DANIEL DEMETRIUS JAMES, JR., a/k/a Dee, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:04-cr-00262-FL-1)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 8, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Demetrius James, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Daniel Demetrius James, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. James, No. 5:04-cr- 00262-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. filed June 30, 2009; entered July 1, 2009).

We further deny James’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.