U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Mills

United States v. Mills
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 7, 2009

United States v. Mills

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6833

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRON MARQUETTE MILLS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cr-00010-BR-1)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 7, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyron Marquette Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Michael Gordon James, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Tyron Marquette Mills appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Mills, No. 4:06-cr-00010-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 21, 2009). We deny Mills’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.