U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Stephens-Frazier v. National Institute of Health

Stephens-Frazier v. National Institute of Health
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 5, 2009 · Niemeyer, Shedd, Agee
332 F. App'x 831

Stephens-Frazier v. National Institute of Health

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dr. Mary J. Stephens-Frazier appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment on her race discrimination, hostile work environment harassment and retaliation claims, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006), and state law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, and its order denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Stephens-Frazier v. National Inst. of Health, No. 1:07-cv-00435-JFM, 2008 WL 2126244 (D. Md. filed May 19, 2008, entered May 20, 2008; May 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.