Searcy v. Stansberry
Searcy v. Stansberry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6396
EDGAR SEARCY, Petitioner - Appellant, v. PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden, F.C.C. Petersburg, Virginia, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00050-REP)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edgar Searcy, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Edgar Searcy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Searcy v. Stansberry, No. 3:08-cv-00050- REP (E.D. Va. Feb. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.