United States v. Chappell
United States v. Chappell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6736
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DUALA CHAPPELL, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (3:95-cr-00017-3-SGW)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 14, 2009
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Duala Chappell, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Bartlett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Duala Chappell appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chappell, No. 3:95-cr-00017-3-SGW (W.D. Va. Mar. 20, 2009). We deny Chappell’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.