U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Saunders v. Nichols

Saunders v. Nichols
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 13, 2009

Saunders v. Nichols

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6307

ANTONIO SAUNDERS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. SGT. NICHOLS; OFFICER DIXON, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN DOE CLASSIFICATION OFFICERS; JANE DOE CLASSIFICATION OFFICERS; JOHN DOE OFFICERS, defendants are being sued each in their individual and official capacities, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:08-cv-01160-LMB-TCB)

Submitted: October 2, 2009 Decided: October 13, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Antonio Saunders appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Saunders v. Nichols, No. 1:08-cv-01160-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 22, 2009; entered Jan. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.