Scott v. Maynard
Scott v. Maynard
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6023
MIKE S. SCOTT, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GARY D. MAYNARD; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER; MR. MILLER; MR. DURST; MR. ROWLEY; MR. SHEARING; MR. GRAHAM; H. THOMAS; DR. HOLWAGER, Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:07-cv-03080-AW)
Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 23, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mike S. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Mike S. Scott appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Maynard, No. 8:07-cv-03080-AW (D. Md. Dec. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.