U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Randall

United States v. Randall
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 22, 2009 · Shedd, Duncan, Agee
334 F. App'x 538

United States v. Randall

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Burnie Lee Randall appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the distinct court. United States v. Randall, No. 4:06-cr-00583-TLW-6 (D.S.C. June 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma *539 terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.