U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Scott v. Hudgins

Scott v. Hudgins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 22, 2009

Scott v. Hudgins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6051

JOEY D. SCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FNU HUDGINS, Sergeant; MATTHEW PENNELL; KEITH WHITENER; BOYD BENNETT, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00137-GCM)

Submitted: July 20, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joey D. Scott, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Joey D. Scott appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint alleging excessive force. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. Hudgins, No. 5:08-cv-00137-GCM (W.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2008). We deny all Scott’s pending motions, including his motions for appointment of counsel, to “Dismiss PLRA Procedure,” to compel discovery, to continue videoconference hearing, for seizure of property/assets, and to impose sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.