U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Harrod v. Baumgardner

Harrod v. Baumgardner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 22, 2009

Harrod v. Baumgardner

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7379

DARRYL HARROD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DAN BAUMGARDNER; DEBBIE CESSNA; R. EICHELBURGER; H. R. MICHAEL, Officer; ALLISON NARDI, Nurse, Defendants – Appellees, and OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA Party-in-Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:08-cv-03299-DKC)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl Harrod, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Katrina J. Dennis, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Darryl Harrod appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harrod v. Baumgardner, No. 8:08-cv-03299-DKC (D. Md. filed July 14, 2009, entered July 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.