U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Ai Qin Yang v. Holder

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 20, 2009 · Michael, Motz, Per Curiam, Shedd

347 F. App'x 950

Counsel

Gary J. Yerman, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Acting Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ai Qin Yang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying Yang’s motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Yang’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2009). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Yang (B.I.A. Dec. 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.