UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7156

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RODRICKA JERMAINE GAMBRELL,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:06-cr-01094-GRA)

Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 27, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodricka Jermaine Gambrell, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rodricka Jermaine Gambrell appeals the district

court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence

filed pursuant to

(c)(2) (2006). We have

reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse

its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v.

Goines,

(4th Cir. 2004) (motion under

§ 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district court”);

United States v. Legree,

(4th Cir. 2000).

Thus, we affirm the district court’s order for the reasons

stated there. See United States v. Gambrell, No. 6:06-cr-01094-

GRA (D.S.C. June 5, 2009). Further, we deny Gambrell’s motion

for transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2