Wilder v. Sebelius
Wilder v. Sebelius
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1310
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 09-1366
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:97-cv-01809-FNS; 1:96-cv-03472-FNS)
Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: November 3, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Tamera Lynn Fine, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district
court’s order denying his motions to reopen two civil actions
that have been closed for more than ten years. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v.
Sebelius, Nos. 1:97-cv-01809-FNS; 1:96-cv-03472-FNS (D. Md. Mar.
4, 2009). Wilder’s motions for rehearing and rehearing en banc,
for appointment of counsel, and for an excusable neglect waiver
are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished