Wooten v. Lightburn
Wooten v. Lightburn
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2279
OLIN WOOTEN,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ROBERT C. LIGHTBURN,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00052-gmw-pms)
Submitted: October 28, 2009 Decided: November 12, 2009
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
C. Connor Crook, BOYLE, BAIN, REBACK & SLAYTON, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Daniel R. Bieger, COPELAND & BIEGER, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Robert C. Lightburn appeals the district court’s order
entering judgment in Olin Wooten’s favor on Wooten’s specific
performance and unjust enrichment claims against Lightburn. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See
Wooten v. Lightburn, No. 1:07-cv-00052-gmw-pms (W.D. Va.
Sept. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished