United States v. Logan
United States v. Logan
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6086
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RONNIE LOGAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:00-cr-00068-MR-1)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 20, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie Logan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ronnie Logan appeals the district court’s order
denying his
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Logan, No. 3:00-cr-00068-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 13,
2009). We deny Logan’s motion for appointment of counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished