Smith v. United States
Smith v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1651
KEVIN MICHAEL SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
DR. PATRIBA CHITTRA MEDDA, a/k/a Petriba Chittra Medda, a/k/a Chitra Medda, a/k/a Chiddra Medda, a/k/a Chittra Medda, VMAC Salisbury and Chrlotte Clinic 1601 Brenner Ave Salisbury, NC 28144,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:08-cv-00427-MR-DCK)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 19, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Michael Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Sidney P. Alexander, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Kevin Michael Smith appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing Smith’s Federal Tort Claims Act suit. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Smith v. United States, No. 3:08-cv-00427-MR-DCK (W.D.N.C.
June 2, 2009). We grant Smith’s motion to supplement the record
and deny the remainder of Smith’s pending motions. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished