United States v. Pierce
United States v. Pierce
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6295
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RICKY LEE PIERCE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:05-cr-00002-H-1)
Submitted: October 27, 2009 Decided: November 16, 2009
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Lee Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ricky Lee Pierce appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Pierce, No. 4:05-cr-
00002-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2009). Pierce’s motions for
appointment of counsel and to hold his informal brief in
abeyance are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished