Booker v. Jenkins

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Booker v. Jenkins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7732

PATRICK L. BOOKER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

VERA JENKINS, Grievance Coordinator,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-01891-HMH)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 25, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick L. Booker, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Patrick L. Booker appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint, as well as the

district court’s denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) Motion to

Alter or Amend a Judgment. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Booker v. Jenkins, No. 2:09-cv-

01891-HMH (D.S.C. Aug. 11, 2009; Aug. 28, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished