United States v. Messick

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Messick

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7426

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NATHAN MESSICK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cr-00058-JPB-1)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathan Messick, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia; Michael Stein, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nathan Messick appeals the district court’s order

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence

reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Messick, No.

3:06-cr-00058-JBP-1 (N.D. W. Va. July 21, 2009). We also deny

Messick’s motion for transcripts at government expense and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished