McNeill v. Ruffin
McNeill v. Ruffin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7453
MICHAEL MCNEILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MIKE RUFFIN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:09-cv-00372-JAB-PTS)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michael McNeill appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) complaint under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeill v.
Ruffin, No. 1:09-cv-00372-JAB-PTS (M.D.N.C. July 31, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished