Danser v. Stansberry
Danser v. Stansberry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7187
DAVID KARL DANSER,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
WARDEN STANSBERRY,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:07-cv-00271-JBF-TEM)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Karl Danser, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
David Karl Danser, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his
previously dismissed
28 U.S.C. § 2241(2006) petition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Danser v. Stansberry, No. 2:07-cv-00271-JBF-TEM (E.D. Va. Apr.
16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished