United States v. Rozier

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Rozier

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7594

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ARTHUR ROZIER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:01-cr-00039-F-2)

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 4, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Rozier, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Arthur Rozier appeals the district court’s order

denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction

in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Rozier, No. 7:01-cr-00039-F-2

(E.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished