United States v. Langford

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Langford

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7485

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DWAYNE ALTWAN LANGFORD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:07-cr-00013-HMH-1)

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 3, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwayne Altwan Langford, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dwayne Altwan Langford appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Langford, No. 8:07-cr-00013-HMH-1 (D.S.C. July 27, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished