United States v. General

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. General

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7590

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TOMMY CARNEL GENERAL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:99-cr-00068-H-3)

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 3, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tommy Carnel General, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tommy Carnel General appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for sentence reduction under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. General, No. 5:99-cr-

00068-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished