United States v. Bailey
United States v. Bailey
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7459
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JERRY ALLEN BAILEY,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:94-cr-00111-GCM-28)
Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 3, 2009
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Allen Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jerry Allen Bailey appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for sentence reduction under
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Bailey, No. 3:94-cr-
00111-GCM-28 (W.D.N.C. July 27, 2009). We deny Bailey’s motion
to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished