Winston v. Grice

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Winston v. Grice

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6187

STANLEY EARL WINSTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLENE GRICE,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA; PRESIDENT OF THE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA; DEAN OF THE ARTS AND SCIENCES DEPARTMENT; CHAIRMAN OF THE BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT; CEO OF THE MEDICAL DIVISION AT THE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT CHARLESTON,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (3:06-cv-03567-TLW)

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 2, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Earl Winston, Appellant Pro Se. Robin Lilley Jackson, Stephanie Pendarvis McDonald, Sandra Jane Senn, SENN, MCDONALD & LEINBACK, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Stanley Earl Winston appeals from the district court’s

order denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) motion to

reconsider the court’s previous denial of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find that

Winston has failed to establish the narrow grounds needed for

relief under Rule 60(b)(3). Great Coastal Express, Inc. v.

International Bhd. of Teamsters,

675 F.2d 1349

, 1356 (4th Cir.

1982). Accordingly, we deny Winston’s emergency motion for

motion for appointment of counsel and affirm. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished