United States v. Middleton

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Middleton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7735

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BERNARD MIDDLETON, a/k/a Cass,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:92-cr-00348-CMH-3)

Submitted: October 29, 2009 Decided: December 11, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Middleton, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bernard Middleton appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence,

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Middleton, No. 1:92-cr-

00348-CMH-3 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 25; entered Aug. 26, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished