United States v. Best

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Best

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7269

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

VINCENT B. BEST,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:93-cr-00216-GCM-3)

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 18, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent B. Best, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Gretchen C.F. Shappert, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Vincent B. Best appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Best, No.

3:93-cr-00216-GCM-3 (W.D.N.C. July 9, 2009). We deny Best’s

motions to remand the case in full and to expedite the decision.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished