Crowder v. Davis
Crowder v. Davis
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7395
KENNETH WAYNE CROWDER,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
KEITH L. DAVIS, Warden, Deerfield Correctional Center,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00321-LO-TRJ)
Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 18, 2009
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth Wayne Crowder, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Wayne Crowder seeks to appeal the district
court’s order dismissing as untimely his
28 U.S.C. § 2254(2006)
petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice
or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not
issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A
prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that
reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the
constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or
wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district
court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell,
537 U.S. 322, 336-38(2003); Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473, 484(2000); Rose v. Lee,
252 F.3d 676, 683-84(4th Cir. 2001).
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Crowder has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished