Gellman v. Cincinnati Insurance Company

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Gellman v. Cincinnati Insurance Company

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1434

BURTON A. GELLMAN; THE GELLMAN CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant – Appellee,

v.

HARRISON S. JONES; RESTORATION ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED,

Movants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:04-cv-00234-GCM)

Submitted: November 18, 2009 Decided: December 17, 2009

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard L. Farley, Christopher A. Hicks, KATTEN MUCHIN & ROSENMAN, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellants. Andrew A. Vanore, III, R. Scott Brown, BROWN, CRUMP, VANORE & TIERNEY, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order entering

judgment in Plaintiffs’ action against Defendant and declaring

repair costs to be the proper measure of covered loss owed to

Plaintiffs by Defendant. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s judgment. See Gellman v. The Cincinnati Ins. Co., No.

3:04-cv-00234-GCM (W.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished