U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Alexander Development Corp. v. Muhammad

Alexander Development Corp. v. Muhammad
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 17, 2009

Alexander Development Corp. v. Muhammad

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1267

ALEXANDER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; MCSHEA MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. RAHEEM MUHAMMAD, Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:09-cv-00132-DKC)

Submitted: November 5, 2009 Decided: December 17, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raheem Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Bernard McParland, BREGMAN BERBERT SCHWARTZ AND GILDAY, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Raheem Muhammad seeks to appeal the district court’s order remanding this case back to state court. Because the remand order was based on a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, we conclude we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2006); Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127-28 (1995); Ellenburg v. Spartan Motors Chassis, Inc., 519 F.3d 192, 196 (4th Cir. 2008); Borneman v. United States, 213 F.3d 819, 824-25 (4th Cir. 2000).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.