Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Jose Rosa Campa-Macias pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine and aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(A) (West 1999 & Supp. 2009) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2006) and was sentenced to seventy-one months of imprisonment. On appeal, counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but raising the following issue: whether Campa-Macias voluntarily consented to the search of his vehicle which contained the drugs at issue.

By pleading guilty Campa-Macias has waived all antecedent non-jurisdictional defects, including the denial of a motion to suppress. Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267, 93 S.Ct. 1602, 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973); United States v. Willis, 992 F.2d 489, 490 (4th Cir. 1993). Once a plea of guilty has become final, this Court’s inquiry is limited to whether the underlying plea was counseled and voluntary. United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563, 569, 109 S.Ct. 757, 102 L.Ed.2d 927 (1989). Our review of the record reveals Campa-Macias knowingly and voluntarily pled guilty.

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.