Rutledge v. City of Norfolk, Virginia

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Rutledge v. City of Norfolk, Virginia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1898

MERLE T. RUTLEDGE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; N.E. KARANGELEN, Officer,

Defendants– Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00129-MSD-JEB)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Richard Fox, Assistant City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint for

failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Rutledge v. City of Norfolk,

No. 2:09-cv-00129-MSD-JEB (E.D. Va. filed July 30; entered

July 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished