U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Rutledge v. City of Norfolk, Virginia

Rutledge v. City of Norfolk, Virginia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 23, 2009

Rutledge v. City of Norfolk, Virginia

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1898

MERLE T. RUTLEDGE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF NORFOLK, VIRGINIA; CITY OF NORFOLK POLICE DEPARTMENT; N.E. KARANGELEN, Officer, Defendants– Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00129-MSD-JEB)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Richard Fox, Assistant City Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Merle T. Rutledge, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rutledge v. City of Norfolk, No. 2:09-cv-00129-MSD-JEB (E.D. Va. filed July 30; entered July 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.