LaRoque v. Conti

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

LaRoque v. Conti

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1906

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SARA A. CONTI,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator,

Party-in-Interest,

JOHN A. NORTHEN, Trustee (Pty),

Trustee,

ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE,

Debtor.

No. 09-1907

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. SARA A. CONTI,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator,

Party-in-Interest,

JOHN A. NORTHEN, Trustee (Pty),

Trustee,

ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE,

Debtor.

No. 09-1908

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SARA A. CONTI,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator,

Party-in-Interest,

JOHN A. NORTHEN, Trustee (Pty),

Trustee,

ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE,

Debtor.

2 No. 09-1909

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SARA A. CONTI,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator,

Party-in-Interest,

JOHN A. NORTHEN, Trustee (Pty),

Trustee,

ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE,

Debtor.

No. 09-1910

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SARA A. CONTI,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

3 MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator,

Party-in-Interest,

JOHN A. NORTHEN, Trustee (Pty),

Trustee,

ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE,

Debtor.

No. 09-1914

GEORGE PAUL LAROQUE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SARA A. CONTI,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

MICHAEL D. WEST, Bankruptcy Administrator,

Party-in-Interest,

JOHN A. NORTHEN, Trustee (Pty),

Trustee,

ROBIN VIRGINIA HEINZE,

Debtor.

4 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00564-NCT; 1:08-cv-00568- NCT; 1:08-cv-00595-NCT; 1:08-cv-00663-NCT; 1:09-cv-00078-NCT; 1:09-cv-00082-NCT)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Paul LaRoque, Appellant Pro Se. Sara A. Conti, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

5 PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, George Paul LaRoque

appeals the district court’s orders: (1) denying his motions to

vacate the bankruptcy court’s judgments and (2) granting the

Appellee’s motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny LaRoque’s motion

to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals for the

reasons stated by the district court. LaRoque v. Conti, Nos.

1:08-cv-00564-NCT; 1:08-cv-00568-NCT; 1:08-cv-00595-NCT; 1:08-

cv-00663-NCT; 1:09-cv-00078-NCT; 1:09-cv-00082-NCT) (M.D.N.C.

July 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

6

Reference

Status
Unpublished