Jarvis v. Enterprise Fleet Services

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jarvis v. Enterprise Fleet Services

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1835

DEREK JARVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 09-1953

DEREK JARVIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. (8:07-cv-03385-DKC)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derek Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, Michelle Bodley Radcliffe, ISLER, DARE, RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Derek Jarvis seeks to appeal the district court’s

paperless orders denying his motions to stay and to recuse the

magistrate judge and the district court’s order granting

Defendant’s motion for sanctions related to Defendant’s motion

to compel discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only

over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2006), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2006);

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541

(1949). The order Jarvis seeks to appeal is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished