U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

Cutchin v. Hogshire

Cutchin v. Hogshire
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2009

Cutchin v. Hogshire

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7747

HARRY A. CUTCHIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD HOGSHIRE, Judge, 16th Judicial Circuit Court, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00802-JRS)

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 22, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry A. Cutchin, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Kugelman, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Harry A. Cutchin appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Cutchin v. Hogshire, No. 3:08-cv-00802-JRS (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.