Kirk v. Curran
Kirk v. Curran
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7567
KAREEM A. KIRK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MARTHA CURRAN; KELLY MILLER; TONYA BROOKS,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:09-cv-00301-GCM)
Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 21, 2009
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kareem A. Kirk, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kareem A. Kirk appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kirk v.
Curran, No. 3:09-cv-00301-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished