United States v. Wilkerson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Wilkerson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7812

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT MOSES WILKERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:96-cr-00167-H-1)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 31, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Moses Wilkerson, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Moses Wilkerson appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence filed

pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Wilkerson, No. 5:96-cr-00167-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished