United States v. Rutland
United States v. Rutland
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7746
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. QUENTIN ORLANDO RUTLAND, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:02-cr-00031-RLV-3)
Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 31, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Quentin Orlando Rutland, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Quentin Orlando Rutland appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See United States v. Rutland, No. 5:02-cr- 00031-RLV-3 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.