United States v. Thompson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Thompson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL J. THOMPSON,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cr-00480-TSE-1)

Submitted: December 14, 2009 Decided: December 29, 2009

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Lundberg Medzius, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Kimberly Ann Riley, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Thompson appeals the district court’s order

denying his self-styled “Motion For Nunc Pro Tunc Order

Directing Award of Pre-sentence Credit Toward Federal Sentence.”

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United

States v. Thompson, No. 1:05-cr-00480-TSE-1 (E.D. Va. filed

May 1, 2009; entered May 4, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished