United States v. Thompson
United States v. Thompson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL J. THOMPSON,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cr-00480-TSE-1)
Submitted: December 14, 2009 Decided: December 29, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Lundberg Medzius, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Kimberly Ann Riley, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Thompson appeals the district court’s order
denying his self-styled “Motion For Nunc Pro Tunc Order
Directing Award of Pre-sentence Credit Toward Federal Sentence.”
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United
States v. Thompson, No. 1:05-cr-00480-TSE-1 (E.D. Va. filed
May 1, 2009; entered May 4, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished