United States v. Gunnell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gunnell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7070

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LARRY ROSCOE GUNNELL, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:99-cr-00022-RLW-1)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 28, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Roscoe Gunnell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larry Roscoe Gunnell, Jr., appeals the district

court’s orders denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(2006) motion and

his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Gunnell,

No. 3:99-cr-00022-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 2009; May 15, 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished