Bentley v. Johnson
Bentley v. Johnson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7647
OCTAVIUS BENTLEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director; JOHN C. JABE, Director,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00253-gec-mfu)
Submitted: December 3, 2009 Decided: December 28, 2009
Before GREGORY and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Octavius Bentley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Octavius Bentley appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2006), as well as the district court’s order denying
Bentley’s “Motion to Vacate.” We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court and deny Bentley’s motion
to appoint counsel on appeal. Bentley v. Johnson, 7:09-cv-
00253-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. Jul. 31, 2009; Aug. 12, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished