U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Allen

United States v. Allen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 14, 2009
306 F. App'x 816

Counsel

Kevin D. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

United States v. Allen

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Kevin D. Alen appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Allen, No. 3:05-er-00041-nkm-bwc-2, 2008 WL 2518550 (W.D.Va. June 17 & 18, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.