U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Ripley

United States v. Ripley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 20, 2009 · King, Traxler, Williams
307 F. App'x 755

United States v. Ripley

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Wilbert L. Ripley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ripley, No. 3:99-cr-00147-REP-1 (E.D.Va. filed Aug. 11, 2008; entered Aug. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.