U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Daley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 20, 2009 · King, Traxler, Williams

307 F. App'x 756

Counsel

Robert James Wagner, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant., Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Richard Charles Daley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Daley, No. 3:02-cr-00251-REP-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 11, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.